Business

Did PSG Player, Hakimi registered properties in the name of his mother and Did his wife ask for half of the property?

Published

on

Numerous reports on social media, as well as some online platforms, says the wife of PSG football star Achraf Hakimi demanded more than half the properties owned by Hakimi as part of her divorce settlement, only to be told that the majority of the properties had been registered in the name of Hakimi’s mother.

The claim is false, here’s what we know

Social media platforms, including Facebook, have been flooded with posts suggesting that Hiba Abouk, wife of PSG footballer star Achraf Hakimi, had filed for divorce and demanded half of her husband’s properties.

 

The post further claimed that during divorce proceedings, it emerged that Hakimi had registered all his property under his mother’s name, and 80% of his claimed €1m monthly payouts from PSG were deposited in his mother’s account.

 

Most of the globally acclaimed credible media houses did not publish the viral report of the young Moroccan star and his wife, except for the report about Hakimi being investigated over rape allegations in France.

 

 

This claim has set up Hiba Abouk and Achraf Hakimi for public contempt, ridicule and possible physical attacks from persons impassioned by the disinformation.

 

Investigations revealed that the post originally emanated from a parody account before going viral across many countries.

 

Though Abouk confirmed her separation from Hakimi on her Instagram page after the talks about the duo went viral, she said nothing of filling a divorce.

 

Though by French and Spanish laws, Hakimi may part ways with up to half of his possession, there is yet to be a legal development about the separation of the couple.

 

There is also no evidence supporting the claim that Hakimi has registered a larger chunk of his property in his mother’s name to prevent his wife from acquiring a portion of the property after the divorce. The Facebook page that first posted the content is a parody page.

CONCLUSION

The claim that Hakimi’s wife demanded half of property for divorce and that Hakimi registered properties in his mother’s name is FALSE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version