Connect with us

Debunking

Does having sex 21 times a month prevent prostate issues?

Published

on

A video shared by Naija PR, shows a medical practitioner saying that men should have sex 21 times to avoid prostate cancer.

The claim is misleading.

 

Prostate problems are unique to men because they have to do with a peculiar reproductive organ. There are three types of prostate problems: inflammation (prostatitis), enlarged prostate (BPH, or benign prostatic hyperplasia), and prostate cancer.

 

Prostate cancer is the abnormal and uncontrollable growth of the prostate (a small walnut-shaped gland in males that produces the seminal fluid that nourishes and transports sperm).

 

Recently, a video was shared by Naija (@Naija_PR) of a medical practitioner identified as Dr Ken asserting that a healthy man should engage in sexual activities 21 times a month to avoid prostate issues.

 

Dr Ken in the one-minute, 23-second video emphasised the need to optimise sexual activity, and if need be, men can have multiple sexual partners to meet their needs monthly.

 

“It is a concept in Physiology; if you don’t use it, you lose it. The only exercise your prostate gland gets is during erection, and that erection comes with sexual activity. So, the study is abundantly clear that a man in healthy shape should be able to have sexual interaction 21 times a month to avoid prostate issues, prostate cancer and cardiovascular issues. If you don’t exercise the gland, it swells on you. It becomes enlarged, and when it becomes enlarged, that is a precursor to cancer.

 

A keyword search led to an article by the Urology Care Foundation, analysing a study that sampled 32,000 men for 18 years. This study found that men who ejaculated the most (at least 21 times a month) had a 20% lower chance of prostate cancer than those who ejaculated four to seven times a month.

 

The foundation, however, noted that ejaculation may or may not affect the risk of prostate cancer. While it helps the prostate by flushing out harmful chemicals that build up in semen, it does not automatically mean it protects against prostate cancer. This is because there may be other factors like a healthy lifestyle. The foundation noted the need for more research to know for sure whether more ejaculation reduces the risk of prostate cancer or not.

 

A gynaecologist, Jeremiah Agim, noted that there are several causes of prostate issues aside from ejaculation, and just tackling ejaculation will not make much difference.

 

“There are many risk factors for prostate cancer. These range from age and family history (inherited gene mutation) to lifestyle. Even infection and inflammation of the prostate have been implicated, an environmental carcinogen (e.g. bisphenol from plastic), exposure to ionising radiation, obesity, and hormonal level (sex hormone and others). Ejaculation frequency is just one of these risk factors; therefore, I don’t think an increase in ejaculation frequency with an increase in exposure to other risk factors will make much difference in the development of prostate cancer.”

 

He also faulted the claimant’s law of physiology about prostate use or exercise:

 

“I will fault his concept of use and disuse. If you want to look at it in that direction, the prostate should atrophy, i.e. become small and not become cancer when not in use, and it should swell when used. Also, it is not only during sexual activity that a man has an erection. Most erections happen during deep sleep. If you remember your biology class on evolution, Jean Lamarck’s theory of use and disuse. He even said such gain in function can even be inherited.”

 

Speaking on available studies, he said, “If you go back to those studies you said you came across. One of the explanations by the authors for increased ejaculation frequency as a protective factor for prostate cancer is not from use and disuse. They explained that ejaculation removes carcinogens which would have remained and accumulated in the prostate, thereby increasing the risk of prostate cancer.”

 

A Urologist, Head of the Surgery Department at the University of Medical Sciences (UNIMED) Ondo State, Olurotimi Ogundunniyi, dismissed the claim as a mere opinion, not a scientific fact.

 

“We all saw the video and discussed it on our forum. We lamented that when there is no information, people spread rumours. There are risk factors for prostate cancer, like age and family history. It is of recent, people have started thinking if there is a link between sex and prostate cancer.

 

“In the past, people thought frequent sex and infection was a risk factor, but there was no research to back it up. Is there a study to show that revered fathers suffer prostate cancer more? No. These are just speculations. There are papers here and there suggesting this. At best, it is the realm of being studied, not science. I assure you he was not speaking science, just his opinion.”

 

Another urologist, Emmanuel Adugba, the medical director at Rock Creek Care Hospital Abuja, noted that not much has been discussed in this area, but he believes it is a matter of sentiments.

 

“That area, not much has been discussed. Anything sex, people tend to exaggerate it. It is subjected to sentiments and emotions. For me, I think of harder issues than sentimental issues.”

 

He explained that if frequent sex was the solution to prostate issues, then clergypersons who do not have sex or celibate people should account for more of the patients of Prostate cancer. At the same time, people who indulge in more sexual activities because of their many wives and concubines should not have prostate cancer, but this is not the case.

 

CONCLUSION

 

The claim that having sex frequently will help avoid sex is misleading as experts have called for further studies since findings are not clear on the matter.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

African News

✴️ Ep.116–WABMA Fake News Debunker;

Published

on

✴️ Ep.116–WABMA Fake News Debunker;

💥 Does Viral Video Show a Market Between Congo and Gabon Where Parents Sell Their Children?

A viral video claims to show a “child market” between Congo and Gabon where parents allegedly sell their children. But is this true? —

Let’s look at the facts. 👀
👇
https://youtu.be/3Qfny74QhC0

🙏Pls. Watch, like & subscribe to our channel! WABMA, in collaboration with media professionals, continues the fight against fake news and misinformation across social and traditional media.

FMI: Visit our website for more verified insights: projectfactchecknigeria.org
…………………………………
#Congo, #Gabon, #HumanTrafficking, #StopFakeNews, #ContentCreators, #NewsAnalysis

Continue Reading

Debunking

Did Akor Adams present the Super Eagles AFCON bronze trophy to Rihanna?

Published

on

A viral image circulating on Facebook and other social platforms shows Nigerian footballer Akor Adams kneeling and presenting a trophy to global music star Rihanna, who appears to be wearing a Super Eagles jersey.

The post claims Rihanna travelled from the United States to support Nigeria at AFCON and was honoured with a bronze cup, becoming emotional during the presentation.

Given the public profiles involved, we examined the claim closely.

WHAT WE CHECKED

We reviewed the viral image and its visual details.
We checked official AFCON protocols and awards.
We reviewed the social media pages and public appearances of Akor Adams and Rihanna.
We searched for coverage from credible sports and entertainment media.

WHAT WE FOUND

The image shows Akor Adams kneeling to present a trophy to Rihanna.
The caption claims the act honoured Rihanna for supporting the Super Eagles at AFCON.

However, there is no record of any interaction between Akor Adams and Rihanna, either at AFCON or elsewhere.

Akor Adams did score goals during AFCON, including notable performances against Algeria and Mozambique.
Rihanna, on the other hand, is a Barbadian American artist with no known public affiliation with the Super Eagles or the AFCON tournament.

We found no evidence that Rihanna attended AFCON in any capacity.
There is no credible sports or entertainment coverage reporting her presence at the tournament.

Major moments involving Rihanna typically attract global media attention.
This alleged event received none.

ABOUT THE “BRONZE CUP” CLAIM

AFCON does not award a bronze cup to spectators or supporters.
Players receive medals, not trophies, for third place finishes.
There is no official AFCON bronze trophy that matches the design shown in the viral image.

ABOUT THE IMAGE ITSELF

The image shows clear signs of digital manipulation.
Lighting, facial detail, and proportions appear inconsistent with natural photography.
The trophy design does not align with any official AFCON award.

Viral pages frequently use AI generated or edited images paired with emotional captions to drive engagement.

ADDITIONAL CONTEXT

Rihanna is not Nigerian and has never publicly claimed Nigerian nationality.
There is no record of her travelling from the US to support the Super Eagles at AFCON.
No credible media outlet has reported such an event.

VERDICT

The claim that Akor Adams presented an AFCON bronze trophy to Rihanna is FALSE.

The image is fabricated, and the story attached to it is fictional.

WHY THIS MATTERS

Fabricated images tied to public figures distort public understanding and erode trust in real sports achievements.
Verifying viral content remains essential.

 

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Analyzing the Phantom Coup in Cameroon?

Published

on

It came fast. It came loud. And it came dressed as breaking news.

“Military coup in Cameroon! Paul Biya removed from power after 41 years!”

The video, shared on TikTok by a user named Jimmoexpress37, opened with dramatic music and flashing red text:
“BREAKING: JUBILATION ACROSS CAMEROON”
“MILITARY TAKES OVER POWER”
“PAUL BIYA NO WHERE TO BE FOUND”

It claimed the coup happened around 5 a.m. The narrator spoke with urgency, describing a bloodless takeover triggered by public frustration over Biya’s long rule.
Soon after, the same video was clipped, shortened to 5 minutes, and pushed across WhatsApp groups in Nigeria, Ghana, and Francophone Africa. The mood? Celebration. Many believed a new chapter had opened in Cameroon.

But something didn’t add up.
There was no mention of the supposed coup on BBC, Al Jazeera, or Reuters—not even on Cameroon’s national broadcaster. For a coup in one of Central Africa’s most tightly controlled countries, this silence was deafening.

So fact checkers started digging.
The earliest version of the video traced back to June 8, 2025, posted by a little-known YouTube channel called Jeunesse Panafricaine, with just 2,700 subscribers. The video seemed real—until you listened carefully.
The narrator’s voice didn’t quite match the visuals. Experts pointed out it carried signs of AI manipulation—that slightly off rhythm, that synthetic clarity that’s too perfect for amateur recording.

Then came the smoking gun: President Paul Biya’s verified Facebook account was still active. Just hours after the video’s circulation, Biya posted a message urging unity:
“Let us not oppose our differences but confront our ideas… Let’s consider our ethnic or cultural differences as enriching factors.”
He was clearly alive, well, and still president!

More checks showed there was no troop movement in Yaoundé, no military declaration, no international diplomatic response—nothing you would expect if a 41-year ruler had been overthrown.

And history supports that. The last coup attempt in Cameroon was in 1984—and it failed. Biya, now in his 90s, has survived more than four decades of political storms. But there has been no successful or confirmed coup attempt since then.

So, what was the video?
Likely, it was AI-enhanced disinformation, the kind used to test reactions, spark unrest, or push particular narratives. With AI, it’s now easier than ever to create the illusion of news without ever stepping into a newsroom.

And that’s the real danger.
False stories about coups can destabilize countries, trigger panic, or even justify preemptive crackdowns. In fragile political climates, lies about power changes can be as damaging as the real thing.

Conclusion: Paul Biya was not overthrown. There was no military coup.
What there was—was a very real attempt to manipulate perception.

Across Africa and beyond, videos, reels, and tweets are shaping opinions, not always with truth.
From fake bans to fictional buildings, from manufactured coups to fabricated scandals—misinformation thrives when facts are not checked.

At WABMA Debunker, we don’t take posts at face value. We follow the facts. And we don’t just question what’s said—we question who benefits when it’s believed.

 

#fakenews #fakenews #debunkit #debunkit #fakenews

Continue Reading

Trending