News
Was the only survivor in the recent Air India crash arrested?
It was one of the worst aviation disasters in recent Indian history.
An Air India Dreamliner crashed shortly after takeoff on June 12, 2025, from Ahmedabad, Gujarat, killing over 270 people. The world mourned. Families grieved. News outlets ran 24-hour coverage. And then, about a week later, another story began to surface online.
This time, it wasn’t about tragedy. It was about deception.
A video posted by an Instagram account named @aviationspotting7 claimed that the crash’s lone survivor, a man named Vishwas Ramesh Kumar, had been arrested for faking his presence on the flight.
The voiceover was calm but accusing. It claimed that Kumar was nowhere on the passenger manifest, He had been caught on CCTV at a local shopping mall during the time of the crash, and had lied to gain compensation or media attention.
The caption was damning:
“Truth revealed: Survivor of Air India crash arrested for falsely claiming to be on board.”
The video was shared widely on Instagram and WhatsApp. Hashtags like #TruthRevealed, #AirIndiaCrash, and #FakeSurvivor added fuel.
People were outraged. They accused Kumar of exploiting the deaths of 270 people. Some demanded he be jailed. Others doubted there had been any survivor at all.
But let’s pause. Because there’s a problem with this story.
Actually, several.
First, no credible Indian news outlet reported Kumar’s arrest. That’s unusual, especially given the intense local and international coverage surrounding the crash.
Second, when journalists reached out directly to law enforcement, they got a very different account.
Jaipal Singh Rathore, Additional Commissioner of Police in Ahmedabad, was unequivocal:
“Mr. Vishwas Ramesh Kumar has not been arrested. He is not under investigation for any such claim.”
In fact, police confirmed that Kumar was onboard the doomed flight. He survived—barely—and was treated at Ahmedabad Civil Hospital for multiple injuries.
So why the confusion?
Investigators believe Kumar’s survival was due to sheer luck—and seat location. He was seated near an emergency exit, which may have allowed him to escape during the crash’s brief but devastating window.
Following his discharge, Kumar even attended the funeral rites of his brother — one of the victims who perished in the crash. Photos showed him visibly shaken, standing beside grieving relatives.
None of this matches the image painted in the viral video.
So where did that narrative come from?
While it’s unclear who produced the false video, analysts point to a growing trend of AI-generated disinformation. With just a few clips, stock footage, and a synthesized voiceover, anyone can manufacture an alternate reality — one that looks real and spreads fast.
But the damage is also real.
Kumar, already a survivor of a traumatic event, had his name dragged through the mud. He was accused, insulted, and questioned — not for what he did, but for what someone said he did.
The verdict: The claim is FALSE. Kumar was not arrested. He survived the crash. He never lied.
What happened to him was not fraud. It was survival.
And once again, the internet proved that a lie told well can still outrun the truth — unless someone stops to check.
That’s what we do here at WABMA Debunker.
African News
✴️ Ep.116– Does Viral Video Show a Market Between Congo and Gabon Where Parents Sell Their Children?
A viral video claims to show a “child market” between Congo and Gabon where parents allegedly sell their children. But is this true?
In this episode of WABMA Fake News Debunker (Ep. 116), we carefully examine the footage, verify available evidence, and separate fact from fiction.
🔍 What we investigated:
- The viral video and its visual details
- Reports from credible international media
- Data from global child-protection organizations
- Any evidence of a “child market” in the Congo–Gabon region
❌ Our Verdict: FALSE
There is no verified evidence that such a market exists. The viral video does not prove child trafficking and has been shared without proper context.
⚠️ Why this matters:
Misinformation like this spreads fear, reinforces harmful stereotypes, and distracts from real child protection issues.
🎓 Learn Media & Fact-Checking Skills with WABMA
Become a skilled media professional in just 5 weeks.
📞 +2349025478072
📞 +2349076985638
📞 +2348187269995
🌐 wabma.org
A troubling image circulating online shows American YouTube star IShowSpeed wearing a Nigerian jersey. His face appears bruised. The caption is alarming. It claims he was attacked by road gang members in Nigeria while livestreaming along Ikoyi Road, Lagos.
It suggests that visiting Nigeria was unsafe. It paints a picture of chaos.
The post originates from an X account, @iamMrMarfo1. From there, it spreads.
But what really happened?
First, let’s examine the context.
IShowSpeed, whose real name is Darren Jason Watkins Jr., was recently in Lagos. He celebrated his 21st birthday. He surpassed 50 million YouTube subscribers. On December 29, 2025, he launched a 20 country African tour in 28 days. On January 21, he livestreamed from Balogun Market in Lagos Island. Crowds gathered. Security escorted him. The scene was intense but public.
Soon after, posts claimed he had been attacked.
The circulating images appeared to show facial injuries.
WHAT WE CHECKED
We examined the footage. According to reporting by Agence France Presse, the images were doctored. AFP traced the visuals back to specific timestamps in the original livestream. Moments at approximately 4:21:32 and 4:21:36 were manipulated to create the bruised effect.
AFP journalists who were physically present in Lagos during his visit reported that they did not witness any attack. They also heard nothing to suggest that an assault occurred. The altered images did not only appear in English. They spread in French, Arabic, Spanish, Hausa, and Zulu.
WHAT WE FOUND
It is important to note that IShowSpeed has faced disruptions during other international visits.
In Algeria, he was struck by thrown water bottles during a football match. In Norway in 2024, he experienced an incident outside a shop.
But those are separate events.
There is no credible evidence that he was attacked in Nigeria. No verified report. No confirmed injury. No authenticated footage. The viral image was manipulated.
Verdict: False.
When dramatic images circulate, especially those that inflame fear or damage reputations, verify before sharing.
Screenshots can be altered.
Livestreams can be edited.
Context matters.
This claim does not hold.
✴️ Ep.116– Does Viral Video Show a Market Between Congo and Gabon Where Parents Sell Their Children?
✴️ Ep.116–WABMA Fake News Debunker;
